The High Court bench held that the civil revision is not maintainable as the matter does not involve a question solely of law, distinguishing itself from the Supreme Court decision in North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation.
Appellant's revision dismissed; earlier order of 09.04.2012 affirmed against revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:5206]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2792/2012
All resident of Villaged Bajrang Nagar, Kota and at present resident of Shivaji Nagar, Dudu, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Claimants/Appellants
Versus
----Non-Claimants/Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Kapil Sharma, Adv. for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Sandeep Mathur, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sandeep Jain, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
04/02/2026
vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku U;k;ky; vk;qDr] deZdkj {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e] 1923 t;iqj f}rh;] t;iqj }kjk okn la[;k WCCF 42/2009 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 09-04-2012 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls nkosnkjku dks dqy 2]23]870@&:i;s izfrdj 12 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr fnyk;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k dk fuosnu gS fd nkosnkjksa dks tks izfrdj jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gS] og vi;kZIr gS vkSj mls ;Fkksfpr :i ls c<+k;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
[2026:RJ-JP:5206]
[CMA-2792/2012]
(2 of 2)
blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sujatha (2019) Supreme Court Civil Reports 8 izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd deZdkj {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e] 1923 ¼vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1923** dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 30 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gS rFkk ,slh vihy fof/k dk lkjoku iz'u varoZfyr gksus ij gh iks"k.kh; gS] tcfd ,slk dksbZ iz'u bl ekeys esa varoZfyr ugha gS] var esa ;g vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa fookn ek= izfrdj jkf'k dh ek=k rFkk iSuYVh jkf'k vkfn ds laca/k esa gS] tks rF;ksa dk fo"k; gS] fof/k dk dksbZ lkjoku iz'u bl ekeys esa varoZfyr ugha gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ^^vf/kfu;e&1923** dh /kkjk 30 rFkk fu.kZ; North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sujatha ¼iwoksZDr½ esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g vihy iks"k.kh; ugha gksus ls [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kker% ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 09-04-2012 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /43
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present civil revision is maintainable under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
Whether the dispute involves a question solely of law as required for Article 133 of the Constitution.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. SujathaExplained¶22
(2019) Supreme Court Civil Reports 8
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mangi Lal & Others
Sunrise Agro Factory
The United India Insurance Company Limited
Uma Shanker Vyas
Dinesh Kumawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
