This order allows an S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal where the High Court held that the impugned order reviving a civil eviction suit was correct and no bias occurred.
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5025/2011 allowed; Impugned order set aside; Civil suit re-instated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:5154]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5025/2011
Mohan Lal S/o Sh. Latoor Lal Gurjar, aged about 24 years, R/o Village Ganesh Ji Ka Jhopda, Dhantari, Police Station Talera, District Bundi Raj.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rinesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Gorang Agarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : None
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
04/02/2026
vihykFkhZ@izfroknh dze&3 ¼vkxs ^^izfroknh dze&3^^ dgk tkosxk½ }kjk ;g nhokuh fofo/k vihy fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k dze&1] cwanh }kjk nhokuh fofo/k izdj.k 18@2004 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 07-11-2006 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS] ftlds ek/;e ls izfroknh dze&3 dk vkosnu vUrxZr vkns'k 9 fu;e 13 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA
izR;FkhZ&oknh dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gS] fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh dze&3 dh cgl lquh x;h rFkk vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
izR;FkhZ&oknh dh vksj ls eqvkotk jkf'k ds laca/k esa ,d nhokuh okn la[;k 14@2001 izLrqr fd;k ftlesa izfroknh dze&3 dh vksj ls fnukad 25-01-2002 dks vf/koDrk }kjk odkyrukek izLrqr djrs gq, mifLFkfr nh
[2026:RJ-JP:5154]
[CMA-5025/2011]
(2 of 3)
x;h rFkk rhu&pkj isf'k;ksa rd tcko nkok is'k djus gsrq volj pkgk vkSj vUrr% izfroknh i{k }kjk vuqifLFkr jgus ij fnukad 26-03-2003 dks ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh djrs gq, fnukad 08-04-2003 dks ,di{kh; fu.kZ; o fMdzh ikfjr fd;k x;k ftlls O;fFkr gksdj vkns'k 9 fu;e 13 lh-ih-lhds rgr nhokuh fofo/k izdj.k izfroknh dze&3 dh vksj ls izLrqr fd;k x;k tks vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 07-11-2006 ds ek/;e ls [kkfjt fd;k x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&izfroknh dze&3 dk fuosnu gS fd izfroknh ij okn ds lEeu ftl fnu rkehy gq,] ml fnu og dkjkxkj esa ltk Hkqxr jgk Fkk] lEeu dkjkxkj esa rkehy djk;s tkus ds dkj.k og viuh iSjoh leqfpr :i ls ugha dj ldkA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; Rabindra Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner, Coopration, Punjab and Ors. (2008) 7 SCC 663 izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd izfroknh dze&3 dh vuqifLFkfr dk mfpr vk/kkj jgk gS] mls vius cpko dk i;kZIr volj ugha feyk gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ,di{kh; fu.kZ; o fMdzh fnukad 08-04-2003 vikLr gksus ;ksX; Fkk] ysfdu mlds ckotwn vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr tkdj izfroknh dze&3 dk vkosnu vUrxZr vkns'k 9 fu;e 13 lhih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;k gSA
vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd bl ekeys esa izfroknh dze&3 dh vksj ls fnukad 25-01-2002 dks vf/koDrk }kjk mifLFkr gksdj odkyrukek@ikWoj izLrqr fd;k Fkk] rhu isf'k;ksa rd izfroknh dze&3 }kjk tcko nkok gsrq volj pkgk vkSj vUrr% fnukad 26-03-2003 dks vuqifLFkr jgus ij ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh djrs gq, fnukad 08-04-2003 dks ,di{kh; fu.kZ; o fMdzh ikfjr dh x;hA Li"V gS fd bl ekeys esa izfroknh dze&3 dh vksj ls vf/koDrk ds ekQZr iSjoh dh tk jgh Fkh] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa uksfVl lE;d :i ls rkehy ugha gq, gks vFkok izfroknh dze&3 dks cpko dk volj ugha feyk gks] ;g rdZ Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gSA izLrqr U;kf;d fu.kZ; rF;ksa esa fHkUurk ds dkj.k orZeku ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksrk gSA
(3 of 3) [CMA-5025/2011]
[2026:RJ-JP:5154]
mijksDr foospukuqlkj Li"V gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr ,di{kh; fu.kZ; rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS ftlesa dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gS] rnuqlkj vihyk/khu vkns'k fnukad 07-11-2006 iq"V gksus rFkk izLrqr vihy [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kker% izLrqr vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /13
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order reviving the civil suit is correct in law and equity.
Whether the respondent failed to prove financial need for eviction was material to revive the suit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rabindra Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner, Coopration, Punjab and Ors.Referred¶21
Rabindra Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner, Coopration, Punjab and Ors. (2008) 7 SCC 663 · Who else cites this
Mohan Lal S/o Sh. Latoor Lal Gurjar
Rampyari (Through Mrs. Mohini)
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
UMA SHANKER VYAS
Parties & counsel
