Disposed

State of Rajasthan v. M/S Bright Bharat H.G. Company

Rajasthan HC5 Feb 2026CRES/110/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

State PWD petitioners sought restoration of a dismissed civil miscellaneous appeal after their Additional Advocate General failed to appear on the fixed hearing date. The court accepted the restoration application at a cost of Rs. 10,000 and ordered the appeal to be taken up afresh.

What did the court decide?

Restoration application accepted with cost of Rs. 10,000; appeal CMA No. 1819/2010 restored for relisting and fresh consideration.

State of Rajasthan Vs M/S Bright Bharat… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:5486]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 110/2022

¶4

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Public Works Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶5

Chief Engineer Roads, Public Works Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶6

Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

M/s Bright Bharat H.g. Company, J.v. (A-Ii), Greater Kailash Enclave-Ii, New Delhi

¶10

V.r. Infra Techno Private Ltd., A-11, Greater Kailash Enclave-Ii, New Delhi.

¶11

Bharat Infrastructure And Engineering Private Limited, Mumbai.

¶12

Shri H.g. Company Infrastructure And Engineering Private Limited, 14, Panchwati Colony, Jodhpur.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Rohit Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Monisha Agrawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anurag Kalavatiya, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. Ms. Anjali Sharma, Adv.

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶16

Judgment / Order

¶17

05/02/2026

¶18

jsLVksjs'ku vkosnu ij lquk x;kA

¶19

fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk dk fuosnu gS fd fu;r is'kh fnukad 13-07-2022 dks rRdkfyd vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk Jh jkts'k egf"kZ dk uke oknlwph esa vafdr gqvk Fkk ysfdu ml le; muds LFkku ij foHkwfr Hkw"k.k 'kekZ fu;qDr gks pqds Fks vkSj mudk uke oknlwph esa mYysf[kr ugha gksus ds

[CRES-110/2022]

[2026:RJ-JP:5486]

(2 of 2)

dkj.k ls mifLFkfr ugha nh tk ldh Fkh vkSj bl dkj.k ls fnukad 13-07-2022 dks vihy vuqifLFkfr esa [kkfjt gqbZ Fkh] vr% iqu% uacj ij fy;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶24

izR;FkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd lacaf/kr vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk vFkok izHkkjh vf/kdkjh dks U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksdj viuk i{k j[kus dk nkf;Ro Fkk] fnukad 12-04-2022 o fnukad 04-07-2022 dks Hkh vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls vuqifLFkfr jgh Fkh] tks mudh ykijokgh dks nf'kZr djrk gS] var esa jsLVksjs'ku vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶25

le;≤ ij uohu vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk dh fu;qfDr gksrh gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa foHkkx ds izHkkjh vf/kdkjh dk ;g nkf;Ro gS fd os uohu vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk dks lwfpr dj mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa mfpr dne mBkosA orZeku ekeys esa izHkkjh vf/kdkjh dh ykijokgh jgh gS ysfdu ;g Hkh Li"V gS fd fnukad 13-07-2022 dks vihy [kkfjt gksus ds rqjar i'pkr~ fnukad 29-08-2022 dks jsLVksjs'ku vkosnu is'k gks pqdk gSA

¶26

laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ;g jsLVksjs'ku vkosnu 10]000@&:i;s dh dksLV ij Lohdkj dj ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k&1819@2010 dks iqu% uacj ij fy;k tkrk gSA

¶27

mijksDr dksLV jkf'k esa ls 5]000@&:i;s izR;FkhZ dks vnk djus gksaxs rFkk 5]000@&:i;s vkt ls lkr fnol esa fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k esa tek djkdj jlhn is'k djuh gksxh] dksLV iwoZorhZ 'krZ gksxhA

¶28

mijksDr vkns'k dh ikyuk gksus ij ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k&1819@2010 dks dk;kZy; }kjk fu;ekuqlkj lwphc) fd;k tkosA

¶29

vuko';d tfVyrk,a mRiUu ugha gks] bl mn~ns'; ls iwoZorhZ varfje vkns'k fnukad 28-10-2010 dks vkxkeh nl fnol rd izHkkoh j[kk tkrk gSA

¶30

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶31

DINESH KUMAWAT /39

State of Rajasthan v. M/S Bright Bharat H.G. Company

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Rajasthan v. M/S Bright Bharat H.G. Company

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijaypal @ Bhura Son of Virendra Singh @ Veero Pahalwan Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohan Lal Vs Smt Rampyari and Ors.

Mangi Lal and Others Vs Sunrise Agro Factory and Others

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Suraji Devi and Another

Piyush Garg S/O Kunj Bihari Garg Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Dheerwani S/O Shri Gulabray Dheerwani Vs Smt. Bharti Devi W/O Late Shri Tekchand