Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS arising from FIR for NDPS offences; petitioner claimed implication via co-accused with non-commercial contraband. Court relied on Apex Court's cautionary observations and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:3412]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10136/2025
Deepak Lal S/o Baluram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Pagaria Police Station Pagaria District Jhalawar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Deora on behalf of Mr. Kalu Singh Sisodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
24/01/2026
[CRLMB-10136/2025]
[2026:RJ-JP:3412]
(2 of 2)
benefit of anticipatory bail.
as under:-
“4. The Grant of anticipatory bail in cases involving Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) is a very serious issue. We, therefore, direct the State to consider as to whether it proposes to file an application for the cancellation of bail granted to the other co-accused.”
dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /233
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a person implicated on the basis of co-accused's recovery in an NDPS case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Anarul SK vs. State of West BengalRelied on¶5
SLP (Criminal) No.12621/2024
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Deepak Lal
State of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
