Municipal corporation sought to withdraw its writ petition as infructuous after the underlying suit was dismissed. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:14546]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14729/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
M/s Priya Construction, Through Proprietor Samesh Bai W/o Shri Naveen Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 226, Adarsh Colony, Daudpur, Alwar (Raj.).
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
01/04/2025
The matter comes up on an application (I.A. No.1/2025) seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition as having been rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the main suit itself has been dismissed, therefore, the present writ petition is also rendered infructuous. He therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed accordingly. The application also stands disposed of.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
Sudeepak/282
Nagar Nigam Alwar, Through Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Alwar
Chairman, Nagar Nigam, Alwar
M/s Priya Construction, Through Proprietor Samesh Bai
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
