Tarachand S/O Shri Norang Singh Kaser Vs State of Rajasthan

Nemi Chand S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 50 Years, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Gram Panchayat Churi, Chatarpura, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

¶20

----Petitioner

¶21

Versus

¶22

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶23

(2 of 4)

¶24

[CW-10577/2025]

¶25

District Supply Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶26

----Respondents

¶27

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10832/2025

¶28

Bhoop Singh S/o Late Ammi Lal, Aged About 52 Years, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Gram Panchayat Dulania, Tehsil-Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj).

¶29

----Petitioner

¶30

Versus

¶31

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶32

District Supply Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶33

----Respondents

¶34

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10833/2025

¶35

Jafar Ali S/o Nanu Khan, Aged About 47 Years, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Gram Panchayat Gangiyasar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

¶36

----Petitioner

¶37

Versus

¶38

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶39

District Supply Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶40

----Respondents

¶41

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10834/2025

¶42

Tarachand S/o Shri Norang Singh Kaser, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Gram Panchayat Dudlod,tehsil Nawalgarh Tarachand, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

¶43

----Petitioner

¶44

Versus

¶45

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶46

District Supply Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶47

----Respondents

¶48

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10835/2025

¶49

(3 of 4) [CW-10577/2025]

¶50

Asgar Ali S/o Chhotu Khan, Aged About 46 Years, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Gram Panchayat Niradhanu, Ward No. 5-9, Tehsil- Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

¶51

----Petitioner

¶52

Versus

¶53

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶54

District Supply Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶55

----Respondents

¶56

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10836/2025

¶57

Seema Kanwar W/o Shri Surendra Singh, Aged About 48 Years, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Gram Panchayat Dabri Dheersingh, Tehsil-Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj).

¶58

----Petitioner

¶59

Versus

¶60

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶61

District Supply Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶62

----Respondents

¶63

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj Mr. Balvendra Singh
		Mr. Rajat Singh Mr. Umesh Choudhary
		Mr. Shyoji Ram Jogi
For Respondent(s)	:	Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao,Dy. GC

¶64

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶65

Judgment

¶66

18/08/2025

¶67

The present bunch of petitions pertain to various districts for allotment and other issues pertaining to fair price shops. The

¶68

[CW-10577/2025]

¶69

(4 of 4)

¶70

competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him.

¶71

Learned counsel for the respondents has taken a preliminary objection that the matters primarily pertain to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. However, he is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioners, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority.

¶72

In light of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court deems it proper to dispose of these petitions with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector on 10.09.2025 at and around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority.

¶73

This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shops qua the disputed sites will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides.

¶74

These petitions are accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.

¶75

Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector.

¶76

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶77

CHANDAN /36-44

Tarachand S/O Shri Norang Singh Kaser v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarachand S/O Shri Norang Singh Kaser v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Sharma S/O Late Ramesh Chand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Tejram Meena S/O Shri Maddulal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Brijkishore Sharma Son of Shri Ramswaroop Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Yamya Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramdayal Son of Shri Rameshwar Sharma, Adopted Son of Shri Chaju Sharma Vs Shankar Son of Shri Bheru

Nemi Chand S/O Shri Banwari Lal Vs State of Rajasthan