Allowed

Manohar Vatarkar S/O Sh. Gajanan Rao v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Nov 2025CRLMB/2218/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in an FIR for offence under Section 380 IPC. The court noted the applicants had joined investigation pursuant to the interim order dated 11.03.2025 and, without commenting on merits, made the interim order absolute and allowed the application.

What did the court decide?

Interim order of 11.03.2025 made absolute; applicants to be released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, with standard conditions.

Manohar Vatarkar S/O Sh. Gajanan Rao Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:44442]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2218/2025

¶4

Manohar Vatarkar S/o Sh. Gajanan Rao, Aged About 60 Years, R/o C-139, Abhilasha Colony, Devas Road, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.

¶5

Smt. Kapila W/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar, Aged About 55 Years, R/o C-139, Abhilasha Colony, Devas Road, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.

¶6

Sradha Vatarkar D/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar W/o Hitesh Pootnees, Aged About 29 Years, R/o C-139, Abhilasha Colony, Devas Road, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Palash Gupta for
	Ms. Sonia Shandilya
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Arti Sharma, PP
	Mr. Rhishi RajSingh Rathore,PP

¶12

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment

¶13

06/11/2025

¶14

The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 10/2025 registered at Police Station Railway Colony District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 380 IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that vide order dated 11.03.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicants subject to the condition that applicants join investigation. In compliance of the same, the applicants joined investigation (undertaken by learned counsel for the applicants).

¶16

Per contra , the learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

[2025:RJ-JP:44442]

[CRLMB-2218/2025]

(2 of 2)

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicants have already joined investigation as directed vide interim order dated 11.03.2025; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 11.03.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶21

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Railway Colony District Kota City in FIR No. 10/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants 1. Manohar Vatarkar S/o Sh. Gajanan Rao, 2. Smt. Kapila W/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar and

¶22

3. Sradha Vatarkar D/o Sh. Manohar Vatarkar W/o Hitesh Pootnees shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶23

(i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade themselves from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶25

(iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶26

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶27

Pooja /264

Manohar Vatarkar S/O Sh. Gajanan Rao v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manohar Vatarkar S/O Sh. Gajanan Rao v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal S/O Shri Sohanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokesh Rawat S/O Saimla, Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Pradhan S/O Vishal Vs State of Rajasthan

Purushottam Bairwa @ Rajraman Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramgopal Son of Bhairulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Kumar @ Guddu S/O Murarilal Vs State of Rajasthan