Allowed¶18

Aidal S/O Daulatiya v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Nov 2025CRLMB/14211/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court Jaipur; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14211/2025; Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur; order dated 12/11/2025; petitioner Aidal s/o Daulatiya; respondent State of Rajasthan (PP Ms. Manju Dave); counsel Mr. Timan Singh; FIR No.312/2025, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur; Section 305(a) BNS 2023; Section 483 BNSS; bail granted; custody since 23.09.2025; personal bond Rs.50,000/-; two sureties Rs.25,000/- each; no opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: petitioner to be released upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with stipulation to appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. ¶18

Aidal S/O Daulatiya Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:45421]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14211/2025

¶4

Aidal S/o Daulatiya, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Daulatiya Ka Adda, Sukhepura, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana, District Bharatpur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

	Versus
State Of Rajasthan,	Through Pp	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Timan Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Manju Dave,PP

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶8

Order

¶9

12/11/2025

¶10

The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.312/2025 registered at Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur for offence under Section 305(a) of BNS, 2023.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that allegation against the petitioner is of stealing ornaments and cash amount from the house of the complainant. He argued that the offence is exclusively triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel again submits that there is no previous antecedent against the petitioner and petitioner is behind the bars since 23.09.2025. The trial of the

[2025:RJ-JP:45421]

[CRLMB-14211/2025]

(2 of 2)

case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Aidal S/o Daulatiya, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶19

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶20

bmg /214

Aidal S/O Daulatiya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aidal S/O Daulatiya v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kedar Singh S/O Babu Pardi Vs State of Rajasthan

Yuvraj Gurjar @ Bhuna S/O Shri Prakash @ Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Monika Gadhawal W/O Rakesh Kumar Chahar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sourabh S/O Dharamveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Boby S/O Rakesh @ Prathvi Vs State of Rajasthan

Bharat Singh S/O Mangu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan