Allowed

Bharat Singh S/O Mangu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Nov 2025CRLMB/12608/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court bench granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case involving possession of 11.920 kg of poppy straw below commercial quantity. The court held that further custody serves no purpose given the pending similar bailable case and allowed release on bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each for appearance till conclusion of trial.

Bharat Singh S/O Mangu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:45367]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12608/2025

¶4

Bharat Singh S/o Mangu Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Retadi Police Station Suwansara District Mandsor (Mp) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rohit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

12/11/2025

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.380/2025 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District-Jhalawar for offences under Sections 8, 15 and 29 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovered contraband from the possession of the accusedpetitioner is 11.920 kg of poppy straw, which is below the commercial quantity. Though there is one case of a similar nature is pending against the petitioner but he has been bailed out. Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 11.09.2025. No custodial interrogation is required and charge-sheet has been

[2025:RJ-JP:45367]

[CRLMB-12608/2025]

(2 of 2)

filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶18

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner- Bharat Singh S/o Mangu Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶21

Arun/100

Bharat Singh S/O Mangu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharat Singh S/O Mangu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kedar Singh S/O Babu Pardi Vs State of Rajasthan

Yuvraj Gurjar @ Bhuna S/O Shri Prakash @ Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Monika Gadhawal W/O Rakesh Kumar Chahar Vs State of Rajasthan

Aidal S/O Daulatiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Sourabh S/O Dharamveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Boby S/O Rakesh @ Prathvi Vs State of Rajasthan