Petitioners challenged an order requiring unfit persons to perform duties as drivers. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous due to petitioners' retirement, death, or termination of services.
Null.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:36453]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6606/2011
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Zaid UL Haq For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
30/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:36453]
[CW-6606/2011]
retired after attaining the age of superannuation. The petitioner No. 2 has expired and services of the petitioner No. 3 have been terminated by the respondents. Counsel submits that under these changed circumstances now no cause of action survives with the petitioner, hence, at this stage, the petition has become infructuous.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Garima/112
Manglararam
Rajendra Kumar
Ramawatar
Hariram
Prakash Chand
Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
