Nanhey Khaa v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order notes the petitioner's death verified by police and panchayat reports. The criminal revision petition is treated as abated and dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition treated as abated and dismissed; pending applications disposed of.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 898/2003
uUgsa [kka iq= vdcj [kka] fuoklh dMksfn;k] HkwriwoZ O;oLFkkid xzke lsok lgdkjh lfefr;ka] dMksfn;k] Fkkuk lqusy ftyk >kykokM+ jktLFkkuA
----Petitioner
Versus
jktLFkku ljdkj
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
03/04/2024
- Pursuant to the order dated 06.03.2024, the Public Prosecutor has submitted the report dated 23.03.2024 furnished by the Station House Officer, Police Station, Sunel District Jhalawar which indicates that the petitioner Nanhe Khan has expired on 14.05.2019. In support of the verification report, the certificate issued by the Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kadodiya, Panchayat Samity, Pidawa Sunel, District Jhalawar has been furnished which indicates that the accused petitioner has expired on 14.05.2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nanhe Khan
- respondent
Government of Rajasthan
Coram
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/898/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court