Petitioner sought anticipatory bail after animals were found in his vehicle, citing regular bail granted to the driver co-accused. The Court declined to entertain the anticipatory bail application given the seven animals recovered, but directed the Trial Court to decide any bail application expeditiously upon surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1976/2024
Mubin S/o Chahat, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Kukarpuri, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
02/04/2024
[CRLMB-1976/2024]
(2 of 2)
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Diksha/14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the registered owner of a vehicle in which animals were found should be granted anticipatory bail when the driver co-accused already has regular bail.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Mubin S/o Chahat
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
