The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the criminal revision petition as infructuous based on the petition counsel's submission without records of further grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50407]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 481/2021
Praddhuman S/o Kishangopal, R/o Village Fatehpur, Tehsil And District Baran (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Mukesh Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Amit Punia, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
09/12/2024
Learned counsel for the revisionist petitioner submits that this revision petition has become infructuous.
In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionist petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /349
Praddhuman S/o Kishangopal
Durga Shankar S/o Mangilal
State of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
