This court dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner. Considering the proven nature of allegations during investigation and the nature of offences under IPC, the applicant was not granted anticipatory relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50268]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 475/2024
Shaitan Gurjar S/o Shri Laxman Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bandha Dharmpura, P.s Raanpur, Kota (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
06/12/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:50268]
[CRLMB-475/2024]
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
DIVYA SAINI /267
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the nature of allegations and evidence collected.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shaitan Gurjar
State of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
