Allowed

Amit Tomar S/O Late Sher Singh Tomar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Dec 2024CRLMB/9084/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a bail application filed by two accused petitioners under S. 483 BNSS. The petitioners were in custody for offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B. Considering the co-accused had been granted bail and the investigation was complete, the Court enlarged the petitioners on bail requiring a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused petitioners enlarged on bail via personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each and two sureties in Rs. 50,000/- each.

Amit Tomar S/O Late Sher Singh Tomar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:50431]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9084/2024

¶4

Amit Tomar S/o Late Sher Singh Tomar, R/o House No. 276, Badayu, Road, Nekpur, Bareli, Thana Subhash Nagar District Bareli, Uttar Pradesh, At Present Tenant Kalyan Hostel, Room No. 118, Goverdhan Nagar, Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶5

Deepak Patel S/o Sompal Patel, R/o Nekpur Bareli, Subhash Nagar, District Bareli, Uttar Pradesh, At Present Tenant Kalyan Hostel, Room No. 118, Goverdhan Nagar, Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kaswa For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Gupta, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶12

Order

¶13

09/12/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 245/2024 registered at Police Station Sodala, District Jaipur City (South) for offences u/S 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the challan papers.

¶17

Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused petitioner in light of the evidence concluded during investigation

[2024:RJ-JP:50431]

[CRLMB-9084/2024]

(2 of 2)

so also the fact that the accused petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2024 and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and more particularly the fact that co-accused Vinod Kumar has already been enlarged on bail, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶24

GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /17

Amit Tomar S/O Late Sher Singh Tomar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Tomar S/O Late Sher Singh Tomar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaitan Gurjar S/O Shri Laxman Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Hukam Singh Vs State

Jahul Khan S/O Karim, Vs State of Rajasthan

Praddhuman S/O Kishangopal Vs Durga Shankar S/O Mangilal

Praddhuman S/O Kishangopal Vs Rakesh Vaishnav S/O Chhitardas

Vishnu S/O Nehanulal Vs State of Rajasthan