The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging a Family Court order directing the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000 to his wife and daughter under Section 125 CrPC. The Court found the order cogent and just, relying on the social justice objective of preventing destitution.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 468/2017
Umesh Kumar Son Of Deen Dayal, By Caste Darji, R/o Chudi Ajitgarh, Police Station Mukundarh, District Jhunjhunu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order
04/04/2024
[CRLR-468/2017]
(2 of 2)
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
MR/168
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's order directing maintenance under Section 125 CrPC requires interference.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs. Bidyut Prava Dixit And AnotherReferred
Dwarika Prasad Satpathy Vs. Bidyut Prava Dixit And Another reported in AIR 1999 SC 3348 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Umesh Kumar
Renu @ Renuka
Leena
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
