Allowed

Vakeel @ Gijjal @ Aamir S/O Tayyab v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Sept 2024CRLMB/8838/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to two petitioners charged with theft under Section 379 IPC. The court cites Supreme Court guidelines regarding immediate trial for theft cases and concludes that discharging the accused is appropriate given their friends lie to garish criminal nature and pending proceedings, directing that they be produced in court immediately.

What did the court decide?

The bail application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution in terms of Section 379 IPC and Section 41 CrPC is allowed.

Vakeel @ Gijjal @ Aamir S/O Tayyab Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38017]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8838/2024

¶4

Vakeel @ Gijjal @ Aamir S/o Tayyab, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jemat, P.s Punhana, District Nuh, Haryana. (At Present Confined At District Jail Karauli).

¶5

Junaid @ Junna @ Makraj @ Bihari S/o Sohrab, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jemat, P.s Punhana, District Nuh, Haryana. (At Present Confined At District Jail Karauli).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asad Ul Haq Nooree For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R.Dhakad, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶12

Order

¶13

06/09/2024

¶14

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk&i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk djksyh ftyk djksyh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 65@2023 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 379 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDRkk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ugha gSA muls fdlh izdkj dh cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr tquSn fnukad 06-03-2024 ,oa odhy fnukad 05-03-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSaA izdj.k esa vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gSA izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% mls tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk,A

¶16

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) ifjoknh ds Vªd dks pksjh dj ys tkus dk vfHk;ksx gSA muds

[2024:RJ-JP:38017]

[CRLMB-8838/2024]

(2 of 2)

fo:) iwoZ ds Hkh blh izd`fr ds vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gSaA os vknru vijk/kh gSa tks yk[kksa :i;s dh lEifRr dks pqjkdj vU;= csp nsrs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vfHk;kstu lk{; lekIr gks pqdh gS ,oa izdj.k fuLrkj.k ds izØe ij yfEcr gSA xEHkhj vijk/k gS] vr% mUgsa tekur ij eqDr ugha fd;k tk,A nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA

¶21

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ij ifjoknh jk?kosUnz flag dk Vªd pksjh dj ys tkus dk /kkjk 379 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vfHk;ksx gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr odhy mQZ fxTty mQZ vkfej ds fo:) pkj vU; izdj.k ntZ gksus ,oa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr tquSn mQZ tqUuk mQZ edjt mQZ fcgkjh ds fo:) 6 vU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gksuk ,oa yxHkx lHkh izdj.k /kkjk 379] 411 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/kksa ls lEcfU/kr gksuk izdV gksrk gS] ftlls mudk ,sls gh vijk/kksa esa ckj&ckj tekur dh lqfo/kk dk nq:i;ksx djrs gq, vijk/k dkfjr fd;k tkuk izFke&n`"V~;k izdV gks jgk gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa Hkh izdj.k dk fopkj.k vafre izØe ij gksuk crk;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjLFkfr;ksa esa bl izØe ij tcfd fopkj.k lekfIr dh vksj gS] izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶23

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶24

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /306

Vakeel @ Gijjal @ Aamir S/O Tayyab v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vakeel @ Gijjal @ Aamir S/O Tayyab v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal @ Garib S/O Rameshwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok S/O Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishna Dutt Sharma S/O Shri Hari Prasad Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Dheeraj S/O Shri Hansraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Akash Meena S/O Dongar Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Prahlad Nayak S/O Boduram Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan