In an anticipatory bail application, the Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was an accident victim, considering the legal provisions regarding the involvement of the accused and the requirement to maintain available evidence.
The anticipatory bail application was allowed. The petitioner was granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:37343]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8818/2024
Gopal @ Garib S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Dughati, Police Station Sadar Hindaun, District Karauli Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Timan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R.Dhakad, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
05/09/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk lnj fg.MkSu ftyk djkSyh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 237@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@21] 8@29 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e 1985 esa tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuk&i= is”k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd mls izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) fcuk oS/k vuqKki= ds 20 xzke Lesd vius vkf/kiR; esa j[kus ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA izkFkhZ ds vkf/kiR; ls 20 xzke LeSd cjken gksuk crk;k x;k gS] tks O;kolkf;d ek=k 250 xzke ls dkQh de gSA izkFkhZ ds fo:) iwoZ dk ,d vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gS tks eknd inkFkZ ds lsou ls lEcfU/kr gS] ftldh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh izfr muds }kjk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA izkFkhZ fnukad 12-05-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds vUos"k.k vkSj fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk iznku fd;k tkosA
blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vfHk;qDr
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-8818/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:37343]
ds vkf/kiR; ls 20 xzke LeSd cjken gqbZ gSA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) xEHkhj vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA vr% vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, tekur izkFkZuk&i= fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds vkf/kiR; ls 20 xzke LeSd dh cjkenxh gqbZ gS] tks okf.kfT;d ek=k 250 xzke ls de gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 12-05-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds vUos"k.k vkSj fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% mi;qZDr rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, bl Lrj ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk&i= l'krZ Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr xksiky mQZ xjhc iq= jkes'oj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk&i= bl 'krZ ds lkFk fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr Hkfo"; esa bl izdkj ds vijk/k dh iqujko`fRr ugha djsxk] Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks] rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk;sA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks ;g Hkh funsZ'k fn, tkrs gSa fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k rd lEcfU/kr iqfyl Fkkus esa izR;sd ekg dh 10 rkjh[k dks viuh mifLFkfr ntZ djk,xkA lEcfU/kr Fkkukf/kdkjh mldh mifLFkfr dk fooj.k izR;sd ekg fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr djsxkA vfHk;qDr }kjk mDr 'krZ dh ikyuk ugha djus ij fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd vfHk;qDr ds tekur fujLrhdj.k ds lEcU/k esa izkFkZuk&i= is'k djus dks Lora= jgsaxsA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /173
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in light of the legal provisions regarding the amount of money involved and his status as an accident victim.
Whether the petitioner needs to maintain available evidence to justify the grant of anticipatory bail.
Whether the petitioner is required to appear before the Magistrate despite the grant of bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mukesh @Amit Kumar v. StateReferred¶13
Mukesh @Amit Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Pawan Gupta v. State of Uttar PradeshReferred¶3
Pawan Gupta v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Mashooq Ahmad Dar v. State of Jammu and KashmirReferred¶2
Mashooq Ahmad Dar v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Beni Lal v. State of MaharashtraReferred¶3
Beni Lal v. State of Maharashtra
Malik Ram v. State of Himachal PradeshReferred¶3
Malik Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh
5 provisions across 4 enactments
Gopal @ Garib s/o Rameshwar
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
Ajay Kumar Singhal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
