High Court Bench at Jaipur rejected a bail application under Section 438 CrPC. The court held that immaterial antecedent cases, including the petitioner's own, must remain pending. Since investigation was not fully complete and no credit was given to antecedent cases, bail was denied.
Application for bail refused; accused not released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:37330]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8739/2024
Ashok S/o Jagdish, R/o Kiro Ki Dhani Kharkhada, Police Station Khetdi Nagar, District Neem Ka Thana, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Is In Sub Jail, Khetdi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R.Dhakad, PP Mr. S.K.Singodiya
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
05/09/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk&i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk [ksrM+h uxj ftyk uhe dk Fkkuk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 91@2024 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 341] 323] 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ /kkjk 323] 341 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k esa ntZ gqbZ Fkh ,oa /kkjk 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k ckn esa tksM+k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 20-06-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA mlds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA vkgr dks dkfjr dksbZ Hkh pksV izk.k?kkrd izd`fr dh ugha gSA vUos"k.k ,oa fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A
blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh ,oa yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj efgykvksa ds lkFk jkWM
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-8739/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:37330]
ls ekjihV dh gS ftlls flj esa vfLFkHkax dh pksV vkbZ gS] ftlds lEcU/k esa fpfdRld us mls izk.k?kkrd gksuk izfrosfnr fd;k gSA vHkh vUos"k.k iw.kZ ugha gqvk gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij eqDr ugha fd;k tk,A
nksukas i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA
i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij lgvfHk;qDr ds lkFk feydj vkgrx.k lkfo=h ,oa 'kkjnk nsoh ds lkFk yksgs dh jkWM ls ekjihV djus dk vfHk;ksx gSA vkgrk 'kkjnk nsoh ds fpfdRldh; izfrosnu ds vuqlkj mlds flj o ukd ls xky rd ds LFkku ij vkbZ nksuksa pksVas fpfdRld ds vuqlkj izk.k?kkrd gksuk ikbZ xbZ gSaA bu pksVksa dks ekjus dk vkjksi izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ij gh yxk;k x;k gSA vHkh rd ds vuqla/kku ls mlds fo:) /kkjk 341] 323] 324] 326] 307@34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k izekf.kr ik;k x;k gSA vHkh izdj.k esa vUos"k.k iw.kZ ugha gqvk gSA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, bl Lrj ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /169
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pardon of the petitioner is applicable given that the investigation is not complete.
Whether bail should be granted when one antecedent has been credited against the accused.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok S/o Jagdish
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
