This order grants bail to the petitioner who is an accused person in a criminal case. The court noted that the investigation is proceeding and the accused has been in custody since April 16, 2024. Bail was granted with surety bonds.
Petitioner granted bail from custody with direction to produce bondsmen.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:37927]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8200/2024
Prahlad Nayak S/o Boduram Nayak, R/o Village Ganedi, Police Station Nechhwa, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Fatehpur, Sikar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajender Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K.Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
06/09/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk&i= varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk usNok ftyk lhdj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 10@2024 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDRkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr rFkk ihfMrk tks fd ifjoknh dh iq=h gS + us xkft;kckn esa tkdj fookg fd;k FkkA fookg ds le; ihfM+rk dh mez dks xyr n'kkZus ds fy, nLrkostksa dh dwVjpuk djus dk vfHk;ksx izkFkhZ ij yxk;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd bl izdj.k esa og fnukad 16-04-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA vUos"k.k iw.kZ gksdj mlds fo:) vkjksi&i= izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gSA og ,d 26 o"khZ; uo;qod gSA vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxkA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk,A
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd ihfM+rk dh mez dks vf/kd n'kkZdj rS;kj fd, x, nLrkost dks fookg
[2024:RJ-JP:37927]
[CRLMB-8200/2024]
(2 of 2)
iathd`r djkus ds le; mi;ksx esa fy;k x;k gSA fof/k foKku iz;ksx'kkyk dh fjiksVZ esa Hkh vaxwBk fu'kkuh bu nLrkostksa ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh gksuk vk;k gSA xEHkhj vijk/k gSA vr% tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= fujLr fd;k tk,A
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA
izdj.k esa vUos"k.k iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 420] 465] 467] 468] 471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vfHk;ksx gSaA vfHk;qDr 26 o"kZ dk uo;qod gSA og fnukad 16-04-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds rdksZa ds izdk'k esa] bl izØe ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izLrqr tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr izgykn uk;d iq= cksnwjke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@ vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /222
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused in the FIR-crime case under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC.
Whether non-appearance of the accused during the pendency of the investigation and the presence of the accused since 16-04-2024 warrant bail.
Prahlad Nayak
State Of Rajasthan
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
