Milind Popat Gharge v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner had been granted default bail by the trial court; counsel submitted that this bail application was infructuous. The court dismissed the application as infructuous.
Petitioner had been granted default bail by the trial court; counsel submitted that this bail application was infructuous. The court dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:29538]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6530/2024
Milind Popat Gharge, R/o House No. A-23, Sahkar Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Through Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence, Jaipur.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akhil Dadhich for Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
15/07/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been allowed default bail by the learned trial Court, therefore, the present bail application has now become infructuous.
In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Ashish Kumar /104
Milind Popat Gharge
Union of India, through Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Jaipur
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court