The court dismissed the bail application of an accused facing charges of murder and destruction of evidence. The court found sufficient evidence, including the last seen theory and recovery of incriminating materials based on the accused's information, to refuse bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:29550]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15162/2023
Saikul @ Sakil S/o Shri Shermohammad, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Chitghana, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Bhiwadi (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas District Alwar)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
N.S. Shekhawat |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Riyasat Ali, Public Prosecutor |
| Mr. | Kuldeep Sharma for complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
15/07/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:29550]
[CRLMB-15162/2023]
complete chain of evidence is not there so as to convict the accused-petitioner, therefore, he may be released on bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Ashish Kumar /12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused is entitled to bail in a case involving charges under Sections 302 and 201 IPC given the evidence on record?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Saikul @ Sakil S/o Shri Shermohammad
State Of Rajasthan
Shri Akbar S/o Shri Chadmal
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
