Allowed

Gajendrasingh @ Gabbar S/O Gyansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC26 Apr 2024CRLMB/1653/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to two petitioners confined in judicial custody for a long duration in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 325, 326, 504 and 506 IPC. The court considered the petitioners' claim of innocence and length of detention.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Gajendrasingh @ Gabbar S/O Gyansingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:19681]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1653/2024

¶4

Gajendrasingh @ Gabbar S/o Gyansingh, R/o Bailara Kalan, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Bharatpur).

¶5

Suresh Chand @ Suri S/o Brijkishor @ Brijlal, R/o Bailara Kalan, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Bharatpur).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain, Adv. with Mr. Kunal Agarwal, Adv. For : Mr. Yashwant Kankhediya, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Kartar Singh Faujdar, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

26/04/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.786/2023 registered at Police Station Kumher, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 325, 326, 504 & 506 of IPC

[2024:RJ-JP:19681]

(2 of 3)

[CRLMB-1653/2024]

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners namely, 1. Gajendrasingh @ Gabbar S/o Gyansingh 2. Suresh Chand @ Suri S/o Brijkishor @ Brijlal shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall

¶22

[2024:RJ-JP:19681] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1653/2024]

¶23

appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of

¶24

hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶25

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶26

GAURAV SHARMA /52

Gajendrasingh @ Gabbar S/O Gyansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajendrasingh @ Gabbar S/O Gyansingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar S/O Ramphal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/O Kesram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rinku @ Avnesh @ Praveen S/O Kesharam Vs the State of Rajasthan

Islam @ Guddu S/O Munna Shah Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Yadav S/O Murlidhar Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Afrid S/O Shri Insar Vs State of Rajasthan