Allowed

Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/O Kesram v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Apr 2024CRLMB/819/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Rajasthan High Court held it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail in a case involving theft. The petitioner was released on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/O Kesram Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:19415]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

819/2024

¶5

Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/o Kesram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Lalpura, Police Station Mahua, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Sawai Madhopur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶12

25/04/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.406/2023 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawaimadhopur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 379 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial

[2024:RJ-JP:19415]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-819/2024]

custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/o Kesram is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

GAURAV SHARMA /48

Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/O Kesram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku @ Abhinesh @ Praveen S/O Kesram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Rathore S/O Shri Mukesh Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahender Kumar Vs State

Pankaj Natani S/O Shri Ghanshyam Natani, Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish Kumar S/O Ramphal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rinku @ Avnesh @ Praveen S/O Kesharam Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sandeep S/O Dayaram Vs the State of Rajasthan