The High Court dismissed the bail application of the appellant, noting that despite the lengthy period of imprisonment, the nature of the allegations and the trial stage precluded bail without adjudicating on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:19623]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 434/2024
Afrid S/o Shri Insar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Malarna Chaur, P.s. Malarna Doongar District Sawaimadhopur (At Presently Confined In District Jail Sawaimadhopur)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Poonam Chand Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. G.S. Rathore, GA-cum-AAG Respondent(s) Mr. Yashwant Kankhedia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
26/04/2024
vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 14&, vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ;g tekur vihy v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k izdj.k½] lokbZek/kksiqj }kjk r`rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= la[;k 13@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 15-01-2024 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk&ckeuokkl esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k & 364@2022 esa vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr
[2024:RJ-JP:19623]
(2 of 3) [CRLAS-434/2024]
dk r`rh; tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt dj fn;k x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] yxk;s x;s lkjs vkjksi feF;k gSa] leku :i ls vofLFkr lg&vfHk;qDr v'kksd dh tekur vU; led{k ihB }kjk fnukad 06-12-2023 dks Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS ftlls izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk fHkUu ugha gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr djrs gq, vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk rFkk lEiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, tekur vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ eas vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa izLrqr rdksaZ ij fopkj fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) e`rd dh gR;k dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gS] mlds fo:) miyC/k lkexzh o lk{; dks fopkj esa ysus ds mijkUr fnukad 19-05-2023 dks f}rh; tekur vihy vLohdkj dh x;h Fkh rFkk ;g vfHker izdV fd;k x;k fd ekeyk 'kwU; lk{; dk ugha gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 26-11-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] ,sls xaHkhj ekeyksaesa 18 ekg dh vfHkj{kk vof/k vR;f/kd vuqfpr ugha dgh tk ldrhA fopkj.k esa lkekU; le; yxuk laHko gS] iwoZorhZ vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds i'pkr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ,slk dksbZ ifjorZu ugha vk;k gS ftlds vk/kkj ij vfHk;qDr dks tekur lqfo/kk fn;s
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:19623] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-434/2024]
tkus ij fopkj fd;k tk ldsA fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls izkIr fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj lE;d :i ls fopkj.k tkjh gSA
vr% izLrqr rdksaZ] izdj.k ds rF;] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksiksa dh izdfr vkfn dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, bl izdze ij izdj.k ds xq.koxq.k ij dksbZ foospu fd;s fcuk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to bail in a case registered under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act given the period of imprisonment already undergone?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Afrid
State Of Rajasthan
Ramlal
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
