The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail to the petitioner, Satish Kumar, an accused in a criminal proceeding, citing his availability for trial and compliance with bail conditions under Article 21.
Petitioner granted bail and directed to be released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:19414]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
659/2024
Satish Kumar S/o Ramphal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Bhaloth, Tehsil Buhana, Police Station Pacheri Kala, Jhunjhunu, At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv. | |
| For | : Mr. M K Sheoran, PP |
| Respondent(s) | Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
25/04/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk dj/kuh] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 1199@23 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 366] 376] 365] 364 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] izdj.k esa ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDRk fnukad 22-12-23 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-659/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:19414]
fd xqe'kqnxh dh fjiksVZ ds i'pkr ihfMrk dks nLr;kc fd;k x;k Fkk ftlesa iqfyl dks ihfMrk }kjk c;ku fn;s x;s fd mlus vfHk;qDr ds fo:) nq"deZ ds dksbZ vkjksi ugha yxk;s gSa cfYd lgefr ls vfHk;qDr ds lkFk tkus dk dFku fd;k gS] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
izdj.k esa 19 o"khZ; ihfMrk us vfHk;qDr ds fo:) nq"deZ dk vkjksi yxk;k gSA izdj.k esa ckn vuqla/kku vkjksii= izLrqr gks pqdk gSA
izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] ihfMrk ds nLrk;kch ds i'pkr fn;s x;s c;ku ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lrh'k dqekj iq= jkeQy dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:19414] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-659/2024]
frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /46
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Whether the conditions for bail were satisfied in the given case.
Satish Kumar
State of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
