Allowed

Altaf S/O Ummed v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Sept 2024CRLMB/10811/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed second bail applications filed by six accused petitioners charged with cheating, forgery, and cyber fraud offenses. The court ordered their release on personal and surety bond despite the Public Prosecutor's opposition.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged petitioners on bail; directed to furnish personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties in sum of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Altaf S/O Ummed Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:37139]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 10808/2024 Sadmohammad S/o Kamrudin, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 10809/2024

¶10

Ajruddin S/o Ummed, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶11

Kadar Khan S/o Ummed, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶12

----Petitioners

¶13

Versus

¶14

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 10810/2024 Parvej S/o Mannan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶20

----Respondent

¶21

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 10811/2024

¶22

Altaf S/o Ummed, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶23

Yusuf S/o Nuarang @ Nurmohammad, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

(2 of 4)

[2024:RJ-JP:37139]

[CRLMB-10808/2024]

Aakil S/o Yunus, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Singar, Police Station Punhana, District Nuh Mewat, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶28

----Petitioners

¶29

Versus

¶30

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶31

----Respondent

¶32

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2^nd Bail Application No. 10812/2024 Jursed S/o Shri Harun, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kathwada, District Deeg. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶33

----Petitioner

¶34

Versus

¶35

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶36

----Respondent

¶37

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
	Mr. Vijendra Yadav
	Ms. Vibhu Sakshi Sharma
	Ms. Anukriti Sharma
	Mr. Vijay Singh Shekhawat
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor

¶38

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶39

Order

¶40

04/09/2024

¶41

These second bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.95/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC and under Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act.

¶42

First bail applications ( S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.7015/2024, 7104/2024, 7105/2024 & 7106/2024 ) filed on behalf of the petitioners were dismissed as withdrawn by this

[2024:RJ-JP:37139]

[CRLMB-10808/2024]

(3 of 4)

Court vide order dated 12.07.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail applications after filing of charge-sheet.

¶47

Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since long and are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Counsels further submit that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners, therefore, they may be released on bail.

¶48

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed these second bail applications.

¶49

Considered the submissions made by learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.

¶50

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsels for the petitioners so also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶51

Accordingly, these second bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

[2024:RJ-JP:37139]

[CRLMB-10808/2024]

(4 of 4)

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that these accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, will celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the accusedpetitioners shall not celebrate their release in public and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of their bail.

¶56

The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in each connected case files.

¶57

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶58

Satyendra/50 & 52 to 55

Altaf S/O Ummed v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Altaf S/O Ummed v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manan Mohan Shara S/O Ravi Mohan Shara Vs State of Rajasthan

Mustak S/O Kalu Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetram S/O Sumer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Awesh Mev S/O Ahmed Mev Vs State of Rajasthan

Subash Chand Vs State

Smt. Bijal Barot D/O Mannu Bhai W/O Kirtan Rao Vs State of Rajasthan