Allowed

Jaid S/O Usman v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2024CRLMB/10552/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an FIR registered under Sections 406 and 120 of the IPC, noting that the co-accused were already on bail, the petitioner was detained, and the trial would likely take time. Bail was granted on personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each for a total of ₹50,000.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each, subject to appearance at every hearing.

Jaid S/O Usman Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:39462]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10552/2024

¶4

Jaid S/o Usman, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sigar, Police Station Bichhor, District Nuh Mewat (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. Mustaq Ahamd For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

18/09/2024

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr tSn dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 08-08-2024 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk egqok] ftyk nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 19@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 406] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA

¶15

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 15-07-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k esa lg&vfHk;qDrx.k jkgqy] vdje] lkfcj] lkftn ,oa tqcsj [kku dks iwoZ esa blh U;k;ky; }kjk tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr ugha gS rFkk mlds fo:) /kkjk 173 ¼8½

[2024:RJ-JP:39462]

[CRLMB-10552/2024]

(2 of 2)

n0iz0la0 esa vuqla/kku yafcr j[kk x;k Fkk rFkk izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k fd;k tk pqdk gSA ekeyk izFke Js.kh eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.k ;ksX; gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkosA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶21

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZa o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA izdj.k esa lg&vfHk;qDrx.k jkgqy] vdje] lkfcj] lkftn ,oa tqcsj [kku dks iwoZ esa blh U;k;ky; }kjk tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ yach vof/k ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vr% izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{;] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr tSn iq= Jh mLeku dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶23

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶24

MANOJ ADWANI /30

Jaid S/O Usman v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaid S/O Usman v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babloo Singh S/O Monohar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Jangid @ Lakki S/O Sunil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Bindraj S/O Gokul and Gokul Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Har Chand Singh through Lrs Vs Jagdish Chand Sharma and Others

Rughnath S/O Late Shri Dhannaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhopal Singh Vs Koshlya Devi and Ors.