Allowed

Har Chand Singh through Lrs v. Jagdish Chand Sharma and Others

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2024CR/135/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge High Court of Rajasthan allowed a civil revision petition contesting the high court's decision to grant special leave to appeal against a civil decree. The challenge rested on alleged procedural impropriety in the composition of the panel and failure to hear parties properly.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition was allowed, and the order of special leave to appeal (S.L.Cal.) dated 15.10.2012 was set aside.

Har Chand Singh through Lrs Vs Jagdish… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:39466]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 135/2012

¶4

Har Chand Singh S/o Shri Kashi Ram, R/o Village Madhuvana, Tehsil Deeg at present R/o Near Mandir Shri Girdhari Ji, Ward No.13, Deeg, Distt. Bharatpur (Since Deceased) hence represented by:-

¶5

1/1. Smt. Bhagmati W/o Late Shri Har Chand Singh, R/o Deeg, Distt. Bharatpur.

¶6

1/2. Smt. Laxmi Devi W/o Shri Bachchu Singh, D/o Late Shri Har Chand Singh, R/o Mathura.

¶7

1/3. Smt. Kushma Devi W/o Shri Sanjeev Kumar, D/o Late Shri Har Chand Singh, R/o Mathura.

¶8

1/4. Devendra Singh S/o Late Shri Har Chand Singh, R/o Deeg, Distt. Bharatpur.

¶9

----Petitioner

¶10

Versus

¶11

Jagdish Chand Sharma S/o Ram Hate Sharma, R/o Deeg, Ward No.13, Owner of Temple Shri Girdhari Ji Maharaj, Bhuda Darwaja, Deeg Distt. Bharatpur, Through Radhika Das Shastri, Officiating Trustee.

¶12

Respondent-Decree Holder 2. Kishan Chand S/o Jeevan Ram (Since Deceased) hence represented by :-

¶13

2/1. Smt. Anguri W/o Late Shri Kishan Chand, R/o Outside Mathura Gate, Gulal Kund Near Khari Kuan, Bharatpur. 2/2. Poonam D/o Late Shri Kishan Chand, R/o Outside Mathura Gate, Gulal Kund Near Khari Kuan, Bharatpur.

¶14

2/3. Puppi S/o Late Shri Kishan Chand, Outside Mathura Gate, Gulal Kund Near Khari Kuan, Bharatpur.

¶15

----Proforma-Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Jh vkye lkguh For Respondent(s) : Jh ;FkkFkZ vxzoky Jh ikFkZ 'kekZ Jh eksuw dqekj

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order

[2024:RJ-JP:39466]

[CR-135/2012]

(2 of 3)

18-09-2024

;kphx.k@en;wuku dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;] flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ¼d-[k-½ Mhx] ftyk Hkjriqj }kjk btjk; izdj.k la[;k&05@2011 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukafdr 15-10-2012 ds fo:) is'k dh xbZ gSA ftlds }kjk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us fMdzhnkj dh vksj ls izLrqr btjk; izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vkns'k 21 fu;e 11 O;ogkj izfdz;k lafgrk Lohdkj djrs gq, dCtk okj.V tkjh djus ds vkns'k ikfjr fd, gSa A

¶23

cgl lquh xbZA

¶24

;kphx.k ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dk fuosnu gS fd btjk; jkf/kdknkl 'kkL=h }kjk izLrqr dh xbZ gS ftls ;g btjk; is'k djus dk vf/kdkj ugha gS ]ewy nkos esa jkf/kdknkl 'kkL=h i{kdkj ugha Fkk] fMdzh txnh'kpan 'kekZ ds uke ls tkjh dh xbZ Fkh] bl vk/kkj ij btjk; [kkfjt fd, tkus ;ksX; Fkh ijUrq fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mDr rF;ksa dk foospu o fo'ys"k.k lgh <ax ls ugha fd;k x;k gS] vr% fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkosA

¶25

blds foijhr ;ksX; vf/koDrk v;kph@fMdzhnkj dk fuosnu gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk tks fMdzh ikfjr dh xbZ Fkh mlesa Li"V rkSj ij vuqrks"k ds en esa mDr tk;nkn dks eafnj dh gksuk ekuk gS o txnh'kpan dks eafnj dk laj{kd ,oa eSustj ekurs gq, okn fMdzh fd;k x;k gS A rRi'pkr~ jkf/kdknkl 'kkL=h dks eafnj dk izU;klh gksus ds dkj.k mlds }kjk mDr btjk; izLrqr dh xbZ gS A fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk lHkh i{kksa ij fopkj djrs gq, vkns'k fnukad 15-10-2012 ikfjr fd;k x;k gS A vr% fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fujLr dh tkosA

¶26

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa o fordksZa ij fopkj fd;k A fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 15-10-2012 dk voyksdu fd;k A fu.kZ; ,oa fMdzh fnukad 30-07-2001 ds fo:) dh xbZ izFke vihy fujLr gq;h gS rRi'pkr~ blds fo:) dh xbZ f}rh; vihy Hkh fujLr gq;h gS A orZeku esa jkf/kdknkl 'kkL=h dks nsoLFkku foHkkx }kjk izU;klh ?kksf"kr fd;k x;k gS ]ftlds }kjk ;g btjk; dh dk;Zokgh dh tk jgh gS A fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius fu.kZ; esa mDr tk;nkn dks eafnj dh laifRr ekuk gS ,slh

[2024:RJ-JP:39466]

[CR-135/2012]

(3 of 3)

fLFkfr esa lHkh rF;ksa ij fopkj djrs gq, fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fnukad 15-10-2012 ikfjr fd;k x;k gS A bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa mlesa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ voS/krk] vuqfprrk ,oa =qfV izdV ugha gksrh gSA vr% mDr vkns'k esa gLr{ksi fd, tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gSA

¶31

ifj.kker% ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fujLr dh tkrh gSA

¶32

fuxjkuh ;kfpdk ds lkFk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= ;fn dksbZ yafcr gSa] rks os Hkh fujLr fd, tkrs gSa A

¶33

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶34

Rishikesh Soni/01

Har Chand Singh through Lrs v. Jagdish Chand Sharma and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Har Chand Singh through Lrs v. Jagdish Chand Sharma and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babloo Singh S/O Monohar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Jangid @ Lakki S/O Sunil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Bindraj S/O Gokul and Gokul Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rughnath S/O Late Shri Dhannaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaid S/O Usman Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhopal Singh Vs Koshlya Devi and Ors.