In this bail order, the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur, presided over by Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The court summoned FIRC, observed no merit, and ordered the withdrawal of the FIR.
Petitioner granted unconditional anticipatory bail and ordered the withdrawal of the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:39117]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10725/2024
Amit Jangid @ Lakki S/o Sunil Kumar, R/o Kankra, Mohammadpur, Police Station Behror, Presently District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
______________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Jh lqesj falag vksyk For Respondent(s) : Jh t;izdk'k frokM+h] yksd vfHk;kstd _______________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
17-09-2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 14-08-2024 ds fo:) ;g tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 483 ch-,u-,l-,l-mls iqfyl Fkkuk ifu;kyk] ftyk t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 153@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 341] 323] 327] 382] 395] 427 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZ A
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] lg vfHk;qDrx.k eksrh] fodze mQZ VkbZxj rFkk fodze mQZ foDdk dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk iwoZ esa tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk pqdk gS] izkFkhZ fnukad&04-07-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vUoh{kk esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur ij NksM+k tkos A
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k A
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-10725/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:39117]
geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ o fordksZa ij euu fd;kA lg vfHkq;Drx.k dks bl U;k;ky; }kjk tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk pqdk gS] vr% izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vk;h lk{;] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@& :i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfer tkafxM+ mQZ yDdh iq= lquhy dqekj dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Rishikesh Soni/06
3 issues framed by the court
Whether grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is justified under the facts and circumstances of the case.
Whether the petitioner maintains the required bank deposit of Rupees 50,000/- in the court account for the grant of bail.
Whether the bail application admits meets the FIRC limits and ordering the arrest of the judicial officer.
Amit Jangid @ Lakki
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
