Allowed

Vinod @ Dhonu S/O Sh Rajendra v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Jan 2024CRLAS/19/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a criminal appeal filed by the accused under the SC/ST (PoA) Act, set aside the lower court's order, and granted bail on personal bond with sureties, observing that the accused had been in custody for a long time and the trial would take time.

What did the court decide?

Appellant released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Vinod @ Dhonu S/O Sh Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:3112]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 19/2024

¶4

Vinod @ Dhonu S/o Sh Rajendra, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Thathka, Police Station Kotkasim District Khairthal Tijara (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas District Alwar

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp

¶8

Satish Kumar S/o Gyarshiram, R/o Khedi, Kotkasim District Khairthal Tijara (Raj)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar, Adv. For : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, P.P. & Respondent(s) Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv., for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

18/01/2024

¶13

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘the Act of 1989’) has been filed in connection with FIR No.427/2023 registered at Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence under Section(s) 323, 341 & 384 of IPC and under Section(s) 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.

¶14

It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is innocent and has

[2024:RJ-JP:3112]

(2 of 3)

[CRLAS-19/2024]

falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-appellant has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence prays for his release on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the appeal.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail.

¶21

The order dated 28.12.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Alwar (Rajasthan) is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed. It is directed that accused appellant Vinod @ Dhonu S/o Sh Rajendra shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the

¶22

[2024:RJ-JP:3112] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-19/2024]

¶23

matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so and shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

DANISH USMANI /242

Vinod @ Dhonu S/O Sh Rajendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod @ Dhonu S/O Sh Rajendra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrasingh S/O Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/O Shri Chhitarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pankaj Roy S/O Prashant Roy Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sobit S/O Harinarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Prem Kumar Prajapat S/O Shri Shankarlal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sachin @ Chiggu S/O Shriram Vs State of Rajasthan