Allowed

Chandrasingh S/O Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2024CRLMB/52/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by two accused charged under Sections 323, 341, 325, 307 IPC with Section 34 and Arms Act 3/25 for assault on the applicant's brother-in-law during a family dispute. Court granted bail without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each; accused to appear on fixed dates and when called.

Chandrasingh S/O Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2738]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 52/2024

¶4

Chandrasingh S/o Mangilal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Sheolal Ka Pura Majra Madanpura Police Station Manoharthana District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶5

Dinesh S/o Mangilal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sheolal Ka Pura Majra Madanpura Police Station Manoharthana District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For : Mr. B S Sharma, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

17/01/2024

¶14

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk euksgjFkkuk] ftyk >kykokM esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 430@23 vijk/k vUrxZr

[CRLMB-52/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:2738]

(2 of 3)

/kkjk 323] 341] 325] 307 lifBr /kkjk 34 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 3@25 vkElZ ,DV esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶19

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gS] vfHk;qDr pUnzflag viuh iRuh dks ysus llqjky x;k Fkk rFkk lqlj vkgr eksguyky mldh iRuh dks Hkstuk ugha pkgrk Fkk vkSj bl jaft'k dks ysdj >waBk eqdnek ntZ djok;k x;k gSA izdj.k esa izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k ls egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gks pqdk gS] izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶22

gLrxr ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd vfHk;qDr pUnzflag] fnus'k rFkk eqds'k us vfHk;qDr pUnzflag ds llqj o vU; ifjtuksa ds lkFk ekjihV dh] vkgr eksguyky ds flj esa xaHkhj pksV vk;h gS ftlds fy, /kkjk 307 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dk vkjksi tksMk x;k gSA ;g pksV lg vfHk;qDr eqds'k }kjk dkfjr fd;s tkus dk vkjksi gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k dk ekeyk lg vfHk;qDr eqds'k ls fHkUu gks tkrk gSA

[CRLMB-52/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:2738]

(3 of 3)

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶27

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k pUnz flag iq= ekaxhyky o fnus'k iq= ekaxhyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgas ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mUgsa vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶28

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶29

Murari Lal Sharma /89

Chandrasingh S/O Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrasingh S/O Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra S/O Jagdish Prasad Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vishal S/O Pappu Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jasveer @ Veera S/O Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Khan S/O Kamruddin Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ghanshyam S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Harphool S/O Shri Mahadev Vs State of Rajasthan