Allowed

Sachin @ Chiggu S/O Shriram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Jan 2024CRLMB/16448/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the accused in FIR No.395/2023, Police Station Sadar, Alwar, for dacoity-related IPC offences. Charge sheet filed; co-accused already bailed. Court allowed bail subject to a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court, subject to appearing on all hearing dates.

Sachin @ Chiggu S/O Shriram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2931]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

16448/2023

¶5

Sachin @ Chiggu S/o Shriram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jaitpur, Police Station Bansur District Alwar Present District Kotputli (Rajasthan) (Presenlty Accused Petitioner Is In The Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Alwar).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta, Adv. For : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, Respondent(s) P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 18/01/2024

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.395/2023 registered at Police Station Sadar, Alwar, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 395, 398, 458, 412, 427 & 342 IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed and similarly situated co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court. He also submits that the accused-

¶14

[2024:RJ-JP:2931]

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16448/2023]

¶16

petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Sachin @ Chiggu S/o Shriram shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶21

DANISH USMANI /06

Sachin @ Chiggu S/O Shriram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin @ Chiggu S/O Shriram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrasingh S/O Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/O Shri Chhitarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pankaj Roy S/O Prashant Roy Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sobit S/O Harinarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Prem Kumar Prajapat S/O Shri Shankarlal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vedraj S/O Shri Kanhaiyalal Kumawat Vs the State of Rajasthan