Allowed

Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/O Shri Chhitarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2024CRLMB/47/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Shanker Vyas allowed the bail application filed by Bhanwar Lal Gurjar. The accused was released on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, without the court expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/O Shri Chhitarmal Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2827]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

47/2024

¶5

Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Chhitarmal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Machada, P.s. Harmada, Jaipur (West), At Present R/o Plot No. 21, Krishnapuri, Neendar Mod, P.s. Harmada, Jaipur (West) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shandilya, Adv., for Mr. Sampat Singh, Adv. For : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna, P.P. Respondent(s) Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Sharma, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

17/01/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.429/2023 registered at Police Station Murlipura, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 406 of IPC.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits

[2024:RJ-JP:2827]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-47/2024]

that the dispute is of civil nature. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/o Shri Chhitarmal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

YOGESH KUMAR /222

Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/O Shri Chhitarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanwar Lal Gurjar S/O Shri Chhitarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra S/O Jagdish Prasad Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vishal S/O Pappu Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jasveer @ Veera S/O Buddh Prakash @ Buddh Singh @ Thimman Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Khan S/O Kamruddin Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ghanshyam S/O Shri Ramesh Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Harphool S/O Shri Mahadev Vs State of Rajasthan