Allowed

Urmila W/O Late Shri Rakesh v. Hukam Singh S/O Shri Kishan Singh

Rajasthan HC22 Feb 2024CRES/108/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration application in a motor accident compensation appeal, filed within limitation. The court declined to pass any order on the Section 5 Limitation Act application and restored the civil miscellaneous appeal to its original number.

What did the court decide?

Restoration application allowed; S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3848/2017 restored at its original number.

Urmila W/O Late Shri Rakesh Vs Hukam Singh S/O Shri… — Motor Accident Claims | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:9110]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 108/2024 in

¶4

SB CMA No. 3848/2017

¶5

Urmila W/o Late Shri Rakesh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bandha, Police Station And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶6

Abhijeet S/o Late Shri Rakesh, Aged About 12 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian, Mother Smt. Urmila W/o Late Shri Rakesh. R/o Village Bandha, Police Station And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶7

Sukhdarshan S/o Shri Bhagmal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Bandha, Police Station And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶8

Shanti Devi W/o Sukhdarshan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Bandha, Police Station And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶9

Mamta D/o Sukhdarshan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Bandha, Police Station And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶10

----Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

Hukam Singh S/o Shri Kishan Singh, R/o Shahpur, Tehsil And P.s. Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (Owner Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05-Ra-9241)

¶13

Rohan Singh S/o Shri Hakim Singh, R/o Tamrauli, P.s. Udhyog Nagar, Bharatpur (Raj.) (Driver Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05-Ra-9241)

¶14

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd., Through Regional Manager, Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., 10003E-Riico Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur (Raj.) 302022 (Insurance Company Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj05-Ra-9241)

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) :

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:9110]

[CRES-108/2024]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶21

Order

¶22

22/02/2024

¶23

The instant restoration application has been filed within the prescribed period of limitation, therefore no order is required to be passed on the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

¶24

Hence, the same stands disposed of.

¶25

Restoration application is allowed for the reasons mentioned therein and S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.3848/2017 is restored at its original number.

¶26

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶27

Ritu/127

Urmila W/O Late Shri Rakesh v. Hukam Singh S/O Shri Kishan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Urmila W/O Late Shri Rakesh v. Hukam Singh S/O Shri Kishan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Mannaram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rampal S/O Late Ghoga Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash Jangid Vs Ram Niwas Saini and Others

Smt. Vimlesh W/O Late Shri Tej Singh Vs Smt. Savitri Devi W/O Shri Bhoop Singh

Devendra Singh Alias Devsa S/O Shri Jait Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kanhaiya Lal and Anr. Vs Laxmi Chand and Ors.