Allowed

Rampal S/O Late Ghoga Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 Feb 2024CRLMB/2191/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the petitioner, granting bail while rejecting arguments on merits, and ordered the petitioner to execute a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner Rampal S/o Late Choga Nayak is enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Rampal S/O Late Ghoga Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2191/2024

¶3

Rampal S/o Late Choga Nayak, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Nayako Ki Gali, Bada Guwada, P.s. Kekri, District Kekri, Raj. (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order

¶10

21/02/2024

¶11

The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.225/2021 Registered at Police Station Kekri City, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 474 IPC (later on offence(s) under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 120 IPC were found to have been made out).

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 25.01.2023. The alleged offence is triable by a Judicial Magistrate, First Class. Similarly situated co-accused Amba Lal has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 03.03.2023 in S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1618/2023. Conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶13

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-2191/2024]

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶16

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rampal S/o Late Choga Nayak be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he will appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶17

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶18

Gourav/33

Rampal S/O Late Ghoga Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rampal S/O Late Ghoga Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Vidhyadhar S/O Bhuraram

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Smt. Beena Bansal W/O Shri Manmohan Bansal

Jaibuna W/O Samma @ Saddam Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Chand S/O Shri Mannaram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Subhash Jangid Vs Ram Niwas Saini and Others

Mohan Lal Jat (Garhwal) S/O Shri Bhagirath Singh Vs Subodh Agarwal