The petitioner filed a writ contempt petition. Joint counsel submitted that compliance with the prior order had already been made during the pendency of the petition, rendering the matter infructuous.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous due to compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:38462]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 633/2017
Satya Prakash Gupta S/o Shri Girdhari Lal Gupta, By Caste Gupta, Resident Of 182, Ganpati Awas, Near Railway Over Bridge, Bundi Road, Kota.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Lokesh Mathur |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sandeep Shah, AAG cum Sr. Adv. |
| assisted byMr. A.S. Rathore |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
07/11/2023
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that during pendency of the present contempt petition, compliance of the order under contempt has already been made, therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated upon in the present contempt petition.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the present contempt petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
74-suraj/divya-
Satya Prakash Gupta
State Of Rajasthan
Shri N.c. Goyal
Shri A.k. Goyal
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
