The court issued procedural directions in a writ contempt proceeding, including fresh notices to the respondent and clarifying counsel representation.
Directed respondent to file plea; directed petitioner to supply two sets of petition; matter re-notified for 08.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 347/2022
Jagdish Chhangani
----Petitioner
Versus
Shri Kunji Lal Meena
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Niranjan Patel |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sunil Beniwal,AAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
06/11/2023
Issue fresh notices to the respondent No. 2 returnable within a period of six weeks. Shri Sunil Beniwal, AAG is directed to accept notice on behalf of the respondent No. 3. Service upon the respondent No. 3 is therefore complete.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply two sets of the contempt petition to Shri Sunil Beniwal, AAG within next three days.
Registry is directed to henceforth display name of Shri Sunil Beniwal, AAG in the cause list as counsel for the respondent No. 3.
Re-notify the matter on 08.01.2024.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
137-divya/-
Jagdish Chhangani
Shri Kunji Lal Meena
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
