The petitioner challenged his denial of appointment as Safaikarmchari, citing a previous judgment removing relative preference. The court dismissed the petition citing delay and laches, noting the grievance arose from a 1996 recruitment long after the cited judgment.
The writ petition and stay application are dismissed on grounds of delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 546/2023
Suresh S/o Shri Madhu Lal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Plot No. 43, Panch Batti, Indra Colony, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Rathore
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
23/01/2023
(2 of 2) [CW-546/2023]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
60-Mak/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained regarding delayed grievance over denied appointment due to relative preference.
Whether the principle of laches applies given the delay in filing the petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mohanlal & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan & AnrReferred¶15
Mohanlal & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr [S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6468/2003]
Suresh S/o Shri Madhu Lal
State Of Rajasthan
Municipal Corporation Jodhpur
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
