Disposed

Karmjit Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jan 2023CW/493/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order in a writ petition filed by a teacher regarding a representation. The court directed the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sri Ganganagar, to decide the representation within eight weeks but clarified that no specific decision was mandated.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondent No. 5 to decide the petitioner's representation within eight weeks and to file a fresh representation within three weeks.

Karmjit Kaur Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 493/2023

¶3

Karmjit Kaur W/o Shri Gurdeep Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Village Post 13 Ff, Manaksar, Tehsil Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶7

The Secretary, Department Of Education, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶9

The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶10

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Sri Ganganagar, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶11

The District Education Officer (Headqurater), Secondary Education, Sri Ganganagar, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶12

The District Education Officer (Headqurater), Elementary Education, Sri Ganganagar, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶13

The Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sri Karanpur, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶14

The Additional Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶15

The Principal / Peeo / Chairman, School Development Management Committee, Government Senior Secondary School, 14 Ff, Panchayat Samiti Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr Inder Jeet Yadav

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-493/2023]

¶20

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶21

Order

¶22

23/01/2023

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondent No.5 – Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sri Ganganagar to decide their representation expeditiously.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a fresh representation within a period of three weeks along with photo-stat copy of the earlier representation and certified copy of the order instant.

¶25

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the respondent No.5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks.

¶26

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶27

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶28

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶29

258-akansha/-

Karmjit Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karmjit Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neelam Vs State of Rajasthan

Pravesh Prajapati Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravina Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan

Vipin Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajender Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan