Partly allowed

Neelam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Jan 2023CW/509/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought posting in her husband's station. Court directed authorities to sympathetically consider her representation based on State policy. Framework for fresh representation and disposal timeline prescribed.

What did the court decide?

Directions to issue a call, consider representation sympathetically based on State policy, and dispose of fresh representation within three weeks.

Neelam Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 509/2023

¶3

Neelam W/o Shri Vivek Kumar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o B-33, Basant Vihar, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Transferred From Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Jaipahari, Jhunjhunu To Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Shri Dungargarh, District Bikaner.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Principal, Shaheed Jagdish Singh Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Jaipahari, Jhunjhunu.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Jangid

¶10

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

20/01/2023

¶13

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post the petitioner to place where her husband, who is in Government service is posted.

¶14

Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including submission that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions.

¶15

In view of the submissions, which have been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CW-509/2023]

¶18

the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government.

¶19

The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with the certified copy of the order instant. If such a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered by the respondents objectively and decided by a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date a copy of this order along with writ petition / representation is placed before the respondents.

¶20

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶21

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶22

44-akansha/-

Neelam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neelam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarita Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Chandra Parashar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohd Khalil Baig Vs State of Rajasthan

Vanay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Santu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pravesh Prajapati Vs State of Rajasthan