Allowed

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 May 2023CW/3621/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court allowed the writ petition relying on coordinate bench decisions Ashok Kumar Sharma and Dhanraj Meena. The court directed respondents to follow Rules 24 and 26 of the RSR regarding the petitioner's pay fixation and disposed of the stay application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to follow Rules 24 & 26 of RSR for petitioner's pay fixation; stay application disposed of.

Anil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/013505]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3621/2023

¶4

Anil Kumar S/o Man Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Village Nagla Chaina, Post Badanagarh, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Raj. Pin Code 321203.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-CumCommissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Rajsamand.

¶9

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur.

¶10

The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand.

¶11

The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Deeg, District Bharatpur.

¶12

District Elementary Education Officer, Rajsamand.

¶13

District Elementary Education Officer, Bharatpur.

¶14

The Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand.

¶15

The Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Deeg, District Bharatpur.

¶16

Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, Govt. Sr. Sec School Sevantri, Panchayat Samiti Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand.

¶17

Panchayati Elementary Education Officer, Govt. Sr. Sec School Songaon, Panchayat Samiti Deeg, District Bharatpur.

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwajeet Singh Ranawat for Mr. S.K. Verma

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶21

Order

¶22

04/05/2023

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the Coordinate Bench decision dated 14.03.2019 rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ Petition

¶24

[2023/RJJD/013505]

¶25

[CW-3621/2023]

¶26

No.15411/2018) and in the case of Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017) , decided on 15.01.2018.

¶27

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the judgments rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar Sharma (supra) and Dhanraj Meena (supra) and it is directed that the respondents while dealing with the case of the petitioner pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the provisions of Rules 24 & 26 of the RSR as per law.

¶28

The stay application is also disposed of.

¶29

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶30

62-Shahenshah/-

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Siddiq Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar Boss Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitender Kumar Verma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Pradeep Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishankant Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Pushpa Devra Vs State of Rajasthan