Disposed

Mohammad Siddiq v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 May 2023CW/308/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this S.B. Civil Writ Petition, the High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a matter regarding service regularization. The court relied on the precedent of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. State of Rajasthan to direct the State Government to examine the petitioner's service records and decide on regularization within a specified timeframe.

What did the court decide?

Direction to State Government to decide the matter of regularization of the petitioner's services.

Mohammad Siddiq Vs the State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

(1 of 2)

[2023/RJJD/013043]

[CW-308/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶5

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 308/2023

¶6

Mohammad Siddiq S/o Shri Mohammad Akhlaq, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Kandharwari Pattela, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶10

The Director, Local Self Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devkinandan Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar, AGC.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

02/05/2023

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.

¶17

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

¶18

“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably

(2 of 2)

[2023/RJJD/013043]

[CW-308/2023]

within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”

¶23

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶24

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶25

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief.

¶26

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶27

156-AnilSingh/-

Mohammad Siddiq v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Siddiq v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Siraj @ Tinku Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Tausif Vs the State of Rajasthan

Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar Boss Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitender Kumar Verma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Chhinder Pal Vs the State of Rajasthan