Disposed

Mohammad Tausif v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 May 2023CW/498/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by various citizens of Dungarpur seeking regularization of services. Relying on a coordinate bench judgment, the court directed respondents to examine veracity and decide the matter within four weeks if averments are correct.

What did the court decide?

Disposed with direction to State Government to decide matter at earliest and facilitate regularization of services if averments are correct.

Mohammad Tausif Vs the State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/012726]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 275/2023

¶4

Ishwar Lal S/o Shri Mangla Ji, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Mathu Gamda Pal Fala Tapra, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 278/2023

¶13

Jayanti Lal Harijan S/o Shri Sardariya Harijan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Basti Obari, Ward No. 6, Obri, Dungarpur, Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶17

The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶18

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 330/2023

¶21

Mohammad Salim S/o Sikandar Khan, Aged About 50 Years, Mohalla Chamanpura Ghati, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶22

----Petitioner

¶23

Versus

¶24

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local

(2 of 5)

[2023/RJJD/012726]

[CW-275/2023]

Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶29

The Director Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶30

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶31

----Respondents

¶32

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 331/2023

¶33

Lal Shankar Nanoma S/o Shri Nathulal Ji, Aged About 47 Years, R/o. 43, School Ke Pas, Mukhya Ganv Siyaladari (Biladi), District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶34

----Petitioner

¶35

Versus

¶36

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶37

The Director Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶38

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶39

----Respondents

¶40

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 358/2023

¶41

Imran Khan S/o Shri Abdul Rehman, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sonia Chowk Chamanpura, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶42

----Petitioner

¶43

Versus

¶44

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶45

The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶46

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶47

----Respondents

¶48

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 359/2023

¶49

Mulchand Nanoma S/o Dewa, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Gaav

[2023/RJJD/012726]

[CW-275/2023]

(3 of 5)

Siyaldari, Mukam Post Bhildi, Dungarpur District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶54

----Petitioner

¶55

Versus

¶56

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶57

The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶58

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶59

----Respondents

¶60

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 362/2023

¶61

Nandlal Bhoi S/o Shri Gautamlal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Bhoiwara Ward No. 16, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶62

----Petitioner

¶63

Versus

¶64

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶65

The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶66

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶67

----Respondents

¶68

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 370/2023

¶69

Shankar Lal Fanat s/o Shri Hurma Fanat, Aged About 37 Years, R/o.Ward No. 5, Biliya Fala, Ganv Palwara, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶70

----Petitioner

¶71

Versus

¶72

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶73

The Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

[2023/RJJD/012726]

[CW-275/2023]

(4 of 5)

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶78

----Respondents

¶79

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 496/2023

¶80

Mohammad Akil S/o Shri Nazir Mohammad, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Mulla Ghati, Hussaine Gali, Khadiya, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶81

----Petitioner

¶82

Versus

¶83

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶84

The Director, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶85

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶86

----Respondents

¶87

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 498/2023

¶88

Mohammad Tausif S/o Shri Mohammad Hussain Pathan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Hakim Ji Ki Gali, Mohalla Ghati, Chamanpura, District Dungarpur (Raj.).

¶89

----Petitioner

¶90

Versus

¶91

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶92

The Director, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶93

The Municipal Council, Dungarpur, District Dungarpur Through Its Commissioner.

¶94

----Respondents

¶95

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devkinandan Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar with Mr. Kuldeep Rajput

¶96

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

[2023/RJJD/012726]

[CW-275/2023]

(5 of 5)

Order

01/05/2023

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised by the petitioners in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.

¶103

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

¶104

“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”

¶105

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶106

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are disposed of, in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶107

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners would be entitled to the relief.

¶108

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶109

42-51/SanjayS/-

Mohammad Tausif v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Tausif v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Pal Singh Solanki Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratan Bhati Vs State of Rajasthan

Rama Damor Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Siraj @ Tinku Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nandlal Bhoi Vs State of Rajasthan