Disposed

Aashik Hussain v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 May 2023CW/1945/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought regularization of the petitioner's services. The Hon'ble Court, relying on a coordinate bench judgment (Jitendra Kumar Tailor), issued directions to the State Government to decide the matter and facilitate the requisite regularization order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the State Government to decide the regularization matter within four weeks to facilitate the issuance of the requisite order.

Aashik Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/013827]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1945/2023

¶4

Aashik Hussain S/o Shri Gani Mohammad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Masjid, Ward No. 7, Sanwad, Udaipur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶8

The Director Cum Joint Secreteary, Directorate Local Self Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶9

The Deputy Director (Administration), Local Self Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶10

Municipal Board, Sanwad, District Udaipur (Rajasthan), Through Its Executive Officer.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Shailesh Agarwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Rajesh Parihar

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

05/05/2023

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019 , decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015 , decided on 09.03.2017.

¶17

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a coordinate Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

[2023/RJJD/013827]

[CW-1945/2023]

(2 of 2)

“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶23

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶24

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief.

¶25

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶26

C-2-Shahenshah/-

Aashik Hussain v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aashik Hussain v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishankant Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Pushpa Devra Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Deora Vs State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar Lal Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan