Disposed

Mukesh Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 May 2023CW/1426/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition concerning a teacher's grievance regarding job location. The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation for transfer to a vacant post within two weeks and directed authorities to decide it within six weeks, without specifying the decision's outcome. The stay application was also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file fresh representation for transfer within two weeks; authority to decide within six weeks; stay application disposed of.

Mukesh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/013790]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1426/2023

¶4

Mukesh Yadav S/o Shri Narayan Lal Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o VPO Itawa Bhopji, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Joint Director, School Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur.

¶9

Meena Kuldeep, Sr. Teacher (Maths), Under Transfer From APO To Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Sudarpura Dhadha, Paota, Jaipur.

¶10

Ramesh Saini, Sr. Teacher (Maths), Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Bosriya, Tonk.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Hemant Choundary G.C.
	Mr. Vishal Jangid,Dy.G.C.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶14

Order

¶15

05/05/2023

¶16

The petitioner contends that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the respondents to consider his representation to post him at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where post of Teacher Grade-II is lying vacant. 2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before the competent authority pointing out vacant posts of Teacher

[2023/RJJD/013790]

[CW-1426/2023]

(2 of 2)

Grade-II within a period of two weeks along with photostat copy of the earlier representation and certified copy of the order instant.

¶21

In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt thereof.

¶22

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶23

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief.

¶25

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶26

120-/Shahenshah/-

Mukesh Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishankant Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Pushpa Devra Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Deora Vs State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar Lal Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan

Aashik Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan