The High Court dismissed a restoration application for the year 2015 due to persistent non-compliance with orders to file service notices for unserved respondents over multiple extended periods.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:35548]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 63/2015
Sunil Kumar And Anr
----Petitioners
Versus
Smt. Lad Devi And Ors
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
17/10/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:35548]
[CRES-63/2015]
(2 of 2)
the notices are not filed within the stipulated period, the restoration application be listed before the Court for dismissal. 4. As per the office report, the complete notices have not been filed till date. 5. In view of above, the present restoration application is dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution.
(REKHA BORANA),J
19-Vij/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the restoration application can be allowed after repeated non-compliance with the direction to file service notices.
Sunil Kumar And Anr
Smt. Lad Devi And Ors
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
