The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a leave to appeal for non-compliance, non-prosecution, and removal of procedural defects in the limitation application and certified final appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:35476]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civ. Leave To Appeal No. 4/2021
Amriko Bai W/o Chinda Singh, Aged About 55 Years, Chak 48 Gb Tehsil Sri Vijaynagar
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None present
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
17/10/2023
“(1) Classification proforma left blank. (2) It is time barred by 341 days counsel not filed Limit. Appl. (3) On leave to Appeal c/f not affixed. (4) Footnote no.1 showing for CFA. (5) On decree and power c/f not affixed. (6) CFA not filed. (7) Court fees for CFA not paid with leave to Appeal although counsel filed application u/o 44 r.1 at F/A.”
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JD:35476]
[CLA-4/2021]
The defects were not removed despite time being granted by the Registrar (Admn.) on 12.02.201 and further by the Court on 11.07.2023.
(REKHA BORANA),J
18-Vij/-
Amriko Bai W/o Chinda Singh
Chinda Singh @ Chinder Singh
Banso Bai D/o Chel Singh
Raj Singh S/o Sardara Singh
Sub-Registrar, Anoopgarh
District Collector, Sri Ganganagar
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
