Fatma v. Mohd. Idris
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to remove defects, specifically blank valuation and court fee, within the granted final opportunity despite previous extensions.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of the appeal for non-removal of defects and non-compliance.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:35457]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 158/2019
Fatma W/o Shri Riyaz Ahamad, Aged About 56 Years, B/c Musalman, R/o Mohalla Laykan, Near Hadiji Nohra, Jodhpur.
----Appellant
Versus
- Mohd. Idris S/o Late Gulam Mohammad, B/c Musalman, R/o Mohalla Laykan, Near Hadiji Nohra, Jodhpur.
- Iiliyas Mohammad S/o Late Shri Gulam Mohammad, B/c Musalman, R/o Mohalla Laykan, Goriyon Ki Pol, Below Masjid, Jodhpur.
- Raish Mohammad S/o Late Shri Gulam Mohammad, B/c Musalman, R/o Mohalla Laykan, Goriyon Ki Pol, Below Masjid, Jodhpur.
- Smt. Rahmat Bano D/o Late Shri Gulam Mohammad, W/o Abdul Karib, B/c Musalman, R/o Mohalla Laykan, Goriyon Ki Pol, Below Masjid, Jodhpur.
- Smt. Diddqui Bano D/o Late Shri Gulam Mohammad, W/o Jamil Ahamad, B/c Musalman, R/o Mohalla Laykan, Near Hadiji Nohra, Sutharon Ka Bas, Jodhpur.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Fatma W/o Shri Riyaz Ahamad
- respondent
Mohd. Idris S/o Late Gulam Mohammad
- respondent
Iiliyas Mohammad S/o Late Shri Gulam Mohammad
- respondent
Raish Mohammad S/o Late Shri Gulam Mohammad
- respondent
Smt. Rahmat Bano D/o Late Shri Gulam Mohammad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/158/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court