Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The high court dismissed an interim bail application as infructuous because the appellant's sentence had already been suspended by a previous order of this court.
The high court dismissed an interim bail application as infructuous because the appellant's sentence had already been suspended by a previous order of this court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 53/2021
Anil Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 32 Years, B/c Sharma, R/o Ward No. 24, Bhadra, Dist. Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
14/03/2022
This is an application for interim bail filed on behalf of the appellant Anil Kumar. However, the sentences awarded to the appellant have already been suspended by this Court vide order dated 14.01.2021 passed in D.B. Criminal 3rd Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No.104/2020. Thus, the instant application is dismissed as infructuous.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
11-Sudhir Asopa/-
ANIL KUMAR
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SANDEEP MEHTA
VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court